OPINION
There I Was...#89
Published on April 25, 2009 By Big Fat Daddy In Misc

It was a quiet night. The two MPs guarding the gate to Echterdingen Army Airfield in Stuttgart were just sitting around being bored and shooting the bull. One of them began to fool around with his pistol. We were still carrying the reliable old M-1911A1, .45 cal pistols in those days. He slyly pulled the magazine out, hiding the action so his partner wouldn't see, then jammed the muzzle deep into his partners neck. His partner was understandably upset, he yelled and swore and the fella with the pistol laughed and told him that he had unloaded it and to prove his point, he pulled the trigger. Instead of the expected "click" of the hammer striking the firing pin, he got the roar and recoil of the pistol firing. He had forgotten to pull the round out of the chamber. Unbelievable as it seems, his partner didn't die. The bullet passed through his throat and out the back of his neck without severing anything that would have been immediately fatal. Oh, he spent a long time in the hospital, and I don't think he was ever whole again. But he lived through it. What got the most attention was the shock and mental breakdown of the shooter. He spent more time in the hospital than the partner did. Then he went to jail.

An MP assigned to guard the driveway to the DCINC's quarters in Stuttgart was sitting in his booth...bored. It was dark, quiet, not a soul in sight. The door to the booth was all glass and at night acted kinda like a mirror. The MP started practicing his quick draw. He was getting pretty fast when the .45 fired. The bullet shattered the door, and sailed out over Stuttgart. The other guards at the compound came a-runnin'...

A female MP assigned to guard the entrance to the Command Building at EUCOM Headquarters was turning in her weapons at the end of her shift. In the process of clearing her shotgun, she pulled the trigger and blew a huge chunk out of the ceiling of the arms room. She had gotten the clearing sequence out of order, pulling the trigger BEFORE she cleared the chamber.

You ask,"How the heck could this happen?" The Army has arguably the strictest standards of weapons safety in the world. In basic training you learn all about your weapon before you ever actually get to touch one. All during the training phases you learn about safely carrying the weapon, safely loading the weapon, safely firing the weapon, safely clearing the weapon, safely cleaning the weapon, even safely counting the weapon. After basic, the litany continues; every encounter with your weapon is preambled with a safety lecture, and there is constant monitoring whenever weapons are out of the Arms Room. It is drilled into us from day one on. Today, more than sixteen years after I retired, if someone hands me a weapon the first thing I do is clear it (to ensure it is not loaded, which includes a check of the chamber). So how do you get a young Spec4 (think "corporal") who forgets to clear the chamber before playing a trick on his partner? Or one who forgets to ensure the safety is engaged while handling a loaded weapon (never mind the quick-draw lunacy)? Or one who gets the clearing sequence wrong, something you do several times a day?

What makes it worse is the fact that all three of these incidents happened within a week of each other; two of the MPs belonged to an elite group that were selected to guard the highest US Headquarters in Europe and its leaders. Talk about embarassing!

So how would you go about fixing this? Do you take away their weapons and issue them pickax handles instead (don't laugh, I have been in units where that solution was applied)? Should we make them wait three days...a cooling off period...before we let them draw their weapons to stand their post? Or maybe we should "Barney Fife" them, issue one bullet and make them carry it in their pocket? This may sound like silliness, but it is exactly the kind of thinking the current crop of gun control advocates' minds are soaked in. We don't need more control on guns. We need smarter and more responsible people handling guns. We need better enforcement of existing gun laws...Lord knows there is no shortage of them. The guns are out there and only a liberal fool would believe it possible to put that cat back in the bag. Not possible. Not constitutional. Not necessary. New gun laws only serve to put more restrictions on law-abiding gun owners...the bad guys have guns and don't care about the law and they aren't about to give up THEIR guns. 

When the Bill of Rights was written, the term "Regulated" referred to a militia being proficient with the handling and use of firearms. We need better regulation...not in the restriction of ownership and use, but in the safe and effective understanding, care, and use of firearms.

 

 

 


Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Apr 26, 2009

From my understaning the Standing Army its self is unconstitutional and that the Founding Fathers really wanted us to have a milita that would be used in times of crises.

on Apr 26, 2009

Despite the absurdity of the above reply, I'll put in my own 2 cents.

We have always had stupid people, and always will. Some folks are just accidents looking for a place to happen.

I've owned/used all manner of weapons, from firearms to edged weapons, all of my life and have been well trained in their handling and use. That's by no means an assurance that I won't do something stupid with them. That requires a measure of smarts and common sense, which not everyone has.

Some folks are dangerous with crayons.

on Apr 27, 2009

From my understaning the Standing Army its self is unconstitutional and that the Founding Fathers really wanted us to have a milita that would be used in times of crises.

The Continental Army was established on 14 June of 1775, before there was a constitution.  After the Revolutionary War and the United States was established, congress established the United States Army on 14 June 1784, to fullfil the duties of "ensuring domestic tranquility and provide for the common defense"...one of the requirements put on government by the constitution.  The term "Militia" referred to the civilian soldiers who would supplement the Army in the event of national emergency...and to protect the people from the excesses of unlawful action by the GOVERNMENT.  The founding fathers knew alot about governmental excesses, they had been dealing with England for decades.  They didn't want the government to extend beyond its purposes.  Read the Bill of Rights and you will see that each of the amendments is designed to limit what government can do.  I hope that clears it up for you.

 

Some folks are dangerous with crayons.

My point eggzaclky!  But we don't outlaw or restrict crayons because of a few drive-by colorers.  Or baseball bats.  Or 10" butcher knives.  Our society is getting loonier all the time, you are exposed to a special brand of loony, the four wheeled nut bag, every day.  I know that over the years you have seen in increase in the stupid maneuvers performed in your space.  The problem that isn't being addressed is the loonyness, instead the lefties use every shooting as proof that guns are evil and we don't need them in our society.  Heavy sigh.  Keep on trucin' Mason. 

on Apr 30, 2009

In my opinion kids should be taught about how to safely act around firearms in school, in a highly regulated environment of course. Also, the current process that you have to go through to ensure that firearms are only in the hands of individuals that are qualified to use them the government has let organized crime take over. The bad guys walk around with guns and are safe because law abiding citizens have to go through hoops to have one. People would be a lot less eagar to pull a gun on someone if they didn't know how many people around them also had guns. Not to mention that if everyone knew what they were doing with a gun you'd have less kids that were curious and go sneaking into daddy's gun closet and get themselves killed because they don't know what they're doing.

Sorry, but in my opinion there are too many laws in place to protect us from our own stupidity when what we should be doing is educate our people to get rid of the stupidity!

From my understaning the Standing Army its self is unconstitutional and that the Founding Fathers really wanted us to have a milita that would be used in times of crises.

As someone else already said the military predates the Constitution. Because of this they are not bound by the Constitution which is why once you sign up they can put you through Basic Training and all the rest. They are bound by their own set of guidelines that are put in place by the government according to the military's own documents. The militia and the right to bear arms were aimed at the population as a whole. The military already had their rules setup before the Constitution was written. It is a common misconception that the right to bear arms refers to the military alone and not to the general population.

on May 01, 2009

mommie4life

Yeah...good stuff.  The Continental Army was replaced by the US Army in 1784...true...the Army does have its own set of laws and rules but they closely mirror those established by the Constitution and Congress.  But soldiers do give up some of their basic liberties when they enlist in the Army (or any military service)...they all know that goin' in, too.  Thanks for the comment.

on May 01, 2009

Our society is getting loonier all the time, you are exposed to a special brand of loony, the four wheeled nut bag, every day. I know that over the years you have seen in increase in the stupid maneuvers performed in your space. The problem that isn't being addressed is the loonyness,

Yup, more people are killed every year due to motor vehicles than guns. Nobody (except me) is lobbying to have motor vehicles banned.

Personally I'd love to haul freight via horse team and wagon.

on May 02, 2009

Personally I'd love to haul freight via horse team and wagon.

Way things are going, you may be seeing that before long!

on May 02, 2009

You know, I lived in Germany for six months a few years ago and I have to say that there are some things they seem to have gotten right. Kids learn to drink first then they learn to drive. Driving is serious business around there because if you mess up too badly you die. They made prostitution legal and then regulated it through government licensing and regular testing so you don't get people spreading sexually transmitted diseases as much. Not like I expect the American people to ever agree to all that, just saying that they don't have people dying from STDs, drinking themselves to death, or driving while intoxicated. If they do drive while intoxicated they usually don't live that long, usually dying instantly because of the higher speed limits and unlimited speed roads.

Just a stray thought.

on May 03, 2009

Just a stray thought.

Keep that thought on a leash, girl!

I spent a little time in Germany, too.  While I agree that there are some things they do get right, I don't think I want to trade societies with them.  As you pointed out, their accident rate is lower but their fatality rate is four times ours.  And as for the social experimentation...why don't you read that part over a couple of times and if it still makes good sense to ya, let me know.

on May 03, 2009

Keep that thought on a leash, girl!

I spent a little time in Germany, too.  While I agree that there are some things they do get right, I don't think I want to trade societies with them.  As you pointed out, their accident rate is lower but their fatality rate is four times ours.  And as for the social experimentation...why don't you read that part over a couple of times and if it still makes good sense to ya, let me know.

Hehe not suggesting that we follow their lead. After all they don't have the same thoughts on hygene and other things that we do over here. Then there's modesty, or lack there of... Seen more than one guy just decide to use the side of the autobahn as a toilet, or the side of the street for that matter. Ewwwww....

on May 04, 2009

YES people make mistakes and there are accidents always and it happens just like driving

how many people are giving driving licences after taking courses in high schools or through private schools

how many people have to demostrate a good knowledge of automible operations before they each and everyone of

them are issued a driving licences 

 YET HOW MANY ACCIDENTS ON THE ROAD ARE THERE DAILY  COMPAIRING THE GUN ACCIDENTS TO THE DRIVING ACCIDENTS

why aren't you pushing pulling all driving licences

another words read this

if you are looking for freedom of the mind

if your are looking for the truth

if you see the very fault of our inner governmental circle

if you believe you are important and you matter

if you are unhappy at what is

if you believe we can make a better tomarrow

then now go to youtube.com

go to jdcriveau check out those videos

support him pass them on to others

join jd to make the united states the country it should be

remember the party system in congress brought us to this point

it is now our time to make it a free governmential body

it is now our time to give all congress a term limit

vote in indepentents  not party people

REMEMBER WE ARE FREE WILL PEOPLE AND WE DO NOT NEED A POLITICAL PARTY

TO TELL US HOW TO THINK AND WHAT WE ARE

 

SO GO TO YOUTUBE.COM  CHECKOUT jdcriveau

 

you deside where you stand and if you agree with jdcriveau then support jd

pass jd on to others

help jd free this nation and in turn we will be an example for the rest

 

thank you

jd

 

on May 05, 2009

Okay...pull their freakin' drivers' licenses.  Stupid people do stupid things...with guns, cars, baseball bats, and Buck knives...What is my point?  Go after "stupid"...not Buck knives, baseball bats, cars OR GUNS.  That was my point.

on May 05, 2009

Big Fat Daddy
Okay...pull their freakin' drivers' licenses.  Stupid people do stupid things...with guns, cars, baseball bats, and Buck knives...What is my point?  Go after "stupid"...not Buck knives, baseball bats, cars OR GUNS.  That was my point.

I agree!

on May 11, 2009

Taking away guns and trying to convince your children that guns don't exist won't stop the violence in the United States. If someone can't shoot you with a gun they will shoot you with a knife, if you take away the knife they will shoot you with a truncheon, and so on until people are being shot in the streets with pillows and kittens.

on May 12, 2009

Nephilim_X

Taking away guns and trying to convince your children that guns don't exist won't stop the violence in the United States. If someone can't shoot you with a gun they will shoot you with a knife, if you take away the knife they will shoot you with a truncheon, and so on until people are being shot in the streets with pillows and kittens.

Here, here!

2 Pages1 2